Main Argument: KKV does not sufficiently address the importance of problemation and deductive theorizing and therefore discount – by virtue of their theory – many plausible and useful comparative political analyses.
== Notes: ==
* KKV state single-observation is not a useful technique to test hypotheses or theories b/c measurement error may yield false negatives
* Sense of process appears to be missing from KKV’s prescriptions for social inquiry 
* Explanation should both (1) fit the data and (2) make sense in terms of consistency with other observations and its own deductive implications
* KKV emphasize the former at the expense of the latter